
...and her daddies, Brent & Wayne.
Photos (and special effects) by Chloe's Daddy!
Hillary gave a rambling response explaining what Spitzer was trying to do but without really taking a position. Dodd disagreed with the Spitzer plan ("I think it's troublesome") and Hillary then stepped in to muddy the waters some more: "I did not say that it should be done," she said, "but I certainly recognize why Governor Spitzer is trying to do it." ...and then by Russert pressing her to give a firm answer ("Do you support his plan?"). Hillary hedged, and never really answered.Ouch!
...[Sen.] Edwards said, "Unless I missed something, Senator Clinton said two different things in the course of about two minutes just a few minutes ago." And [Sen.] Obama uttered a devastating phrase for anyone who remembers the 2004 campaign: he said he couldn't tell if she is "for it or against it."
Rudy Giuliani is probably the most underqualified person since George Bush to run for president. He can only say 3 things in a sentence: a noun, a verb, and "9/11." This man is truly not qualified to be president.He shoots, he scores!
Advocate: I know you’re in a difficult position here trying to balance these two constituencies -- but by keeping McClurkin on the tour, didn't you essentially choose your Christian constituency over your gay constituency?As an American voter who has criticized President Bush for not including members of the opposition party in his wartime government - and for not even listening to the viewpoints of those who disagree with him - it would be hypocritical of me to withdraw a possible vote for Sen. Obama over this McClurkin appearance. Does what the gospel singer said make my skin crawl? Yes. Do I think his viewpoints promote hatred? Of course I do. But in his interview with the Advocate , Obama makes a point. Playing the game the extreme left wants him to play would prevent him from uniting a country that hasn't been this divided since the Civil War.
Obama: No, I profoundly disagree with that. This is not a situation where I have backed off my positions one iota. You’re talking to somebody who talked about gay Americans in his convention speech in 2004, who talked about them in his announcement speech for the president of the United States, who talks about gay Americans almost constantly in his stump speeches. If there’s somebody out there who’s been more consistent in including LGBT Americans in his or her vision of what America should be, then I would be interested in knowing who that person is.
One of the things that always comes up in presidential campaigns is, if you’ve got multiple supporters all over the place, should the candidate then be held responsible for the every single view of every one of his supporters? And obviously that’s not possible. And if I start playing that game, then it will be very difficult for me to do what I think I can do best, which is bring the country together.
It was absolutely a bad decision. I regret it happened. Certainly … I should have stopped it...we’re working very hard to establish credibility and integrity, and I would hope this does not undermine it.-John “Pat” Philbin, FEMA’s director of external affairs, apologizing for yet another department fiasco in which his department held a fake news conference during the LA and San Diego brush fires.
[Bush is] an inexperienced president with a fundamentalist psyche and a paranoid and power-hungry vice-president who decided to embrace "the dark side" almost as soon as the second tower fell, and who is still trying to avenge Nixon. Until they are both gone from office, we are in grave danger...And since they have utter contempt for the role of the Congress in declaring war, we and the world are helpless to stop them. Every day we get through with them in power, I say a silent prayer of thanks that the worst hasn't happened. Yet.-Andrew Sullivan's excellent post from yesterday, entitled "Imaginationland."
So, I guess the question is, does adding a voice of tolerance negate the hater on the other end of the scale, which is what Obama's intention seems to be with this move? If a candidate's tour included Fred Phelps but he or she decided to suddenly "balance it out" at the last minute by adding Judy Shepard, what kind of message does that send?Correct me if I'm wrong, but McClurkin hasn't picketed the funerals of gay Americans, nor has he picketed the funerals of Iraq War casualties under the guise of America's moral decline. Fred Phelps is bat-shit looney and not even the christian right take him seriously. Obviously, McClurkin needs a swift kick in the ass - and a lot of what he has said is indefensible - but he's not Phelps.
Greenland's ice sheet and other Arctic areas could cause sea levels to rise enough to flood low-lying cities, such as Shanghai, China, and New York City, displacing millions of people in the process.Say it with me: Al Gore for President!
I took a city that was full of pornography and licked it.-Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani, on how he cleaned up Times Square, to the New York Daily News.
And then the wildfires of Southern California engulfed the land like a raging judgment against the radicalized anti-christian California rebels. How low will we go? Why won't they listen? Why won't they stop their madness?-"Ex-Gay" James Hartline, spewing his heavenly analysis on the Southern California wildfires.
...in the last days, the nations will rebel against God until He can't take it anymore. Was it all worth it? Were the few years of sexual immorality worth the eternal destruction and earthly chaos it brought? How low will we go?
I think there is a handful of people who hate America. Unfortunately for them, a lot of them are losing their homes in a forest fire today.CNN's resident asshole made the comment as forest fires destroyed hundreds of square miles between Santa Barbara and San Diego in Southern California, leaving one person dead, four firefighters wounded, and forcing 250,000 people from their homes.
I always thought of Dumbledore as gay...Dumbledore fell in love with Grindelwald...
...In fact, recently I was in a script read-through for the sixth film, and they had Dumbledore saying a line to Harry early in the script saying, 'I knew a girl once, whose hair...' I had to write a little note in the margin and slide it along to the scriptwriter, "Dumbledore's gay!"
1. Would you have sex with a man to stop a terrorist attack?Heh heh!
2. If you had a time machine, would you travel back in time and abort Bin Laden?
3. Would you torture and kill Jesus to ensure mankind’s salvation? And how does that work?
4. If lowering taxes results in increased revenues then would lowering taxes to zero result in infinite revenues?
5. (For Rudy Giuliani specifically): How many alimony checks does the sanctity of marriage cost?
Hillary is not the first politician in Washington to declare 'mission accomplished' a little too soon.He shoots, he scores!
I don't want to be invited to the family hunting party.
What I'm tellin' ya is there's a lotta dialogue goin' on and that's positive...and (we) will continue to dialoguing with the Turks.-Little Georgie Bush, answering a question about Turkey's threat to attack northern Iraq, during this morning's press conference in which the President practically held his breath and pounded his fists on the floor at questions asked by NBC's David Gregory and ABC's Martha Radditz.
Seeing Al Gore so deservedly share the Nobel Peace Prize, it is impossible not to note the contrast in his leadership and that of George W. Bush.Vision? Strategy? An inspiring commander-in-chief?
Mr. Gore and Mr. Bush each faced a crucible moment. For Mr. Gore, it was winning the popular vote and having the election taken away from him by a Republican-dominated Supreme Court. For Mr. Bush, it was the shocking terrorist attack on 9/11.
Mr. Gore lost the presidency, but in the dignity and grace with which he gave up his legal fight, he united America. Then, faced with what to do with the rest of his life, he took up a personal crusade to combat climate change, even though the odds were stacked against him, his soapbox was small, his audiences were measured in hundreds, and his critics were legion. Nevertheless, Mr. Gore stuck with it and over time has played a central role in building a global consensus for action on this issue.
“No matter what happens, sooner or later character in leadership is revealed,” said David Rothkopf, author of the upcoming “Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making.” “Gore lost the election and had to figure out what to do with the rest of his life. He took the initiative to get the country and the world to focus on a common threat — climate change. Bush won the election and for the first year really didn’t know what to do with it. When, on 9/11, we and the world were suddenly faced with a common threat — terrorism and Al Qaeda — the whole world was ready to line up behind him, but time and again he just divided us at home and abroad.”
Indeed, Mr. Bush, rather than taking all that unity and using it to rebuild America for the 21st century, took all that unity and used it to push the narrow agenda of his “base.” He used all that unity to take a far-right agenda on taxes and social issues that was going nowhere on 9/10 and drive it into a 9/12 world.
Never has so much national unity — which could have been used to develop a real energy policy, reverse our coming Social Security deficit, assemble a lasting coalition to deal with Afghanistan and Iraq, maybe even get a national health care program — been used to build so little. That is what historians will note most about Mr. Bush’s tenure — the sheer wasted opportunity of it all.
Yes, Iraq was always going to be hugely difficult, but the potential payoff of erecting a decent, democratizing government in the heart of the Arab world was also enormous. Yet Mr. Bush, in his signature issue, never mobilized the country, never punished incompetence, never made the bad guys “fight all of us,” as Bill Maher put it, by at least pushing through a real energy policy to reduce the resources of the very people we were fighting. He thought he could change the world with 50.1 percent of the country, and he couldn’t.
“Gore, even without the presidency, used all the modern tools of communication, the Internet, video and globalization to reach out and galvanize a global movement,” Mr. Rothkopf said. “Bush took the greatest platform in the world and dug himself a policy grave.”
Now Mr. Bush is a spent force and Mr. Gore is, apparently, not running. So we still need a president who can unify the country around meaningful action on energy and climate. Most of the Democratic candidates mouth the right words, but I don’t sense much real passion. Most of the Republican candidates seem to be brain-dead on the energy/climate challenge. And it is amazing to me how flat-out wrong some conservatives, like Rush Limbaugh, can be on this issue.
They can’t see what is staring us in the face — that in pushing American companies to become greener, we are pushing them to become more productive, more innovative, more efficient and more competitive.
You can’t make a product greener without making it smarter and more in demand — whether it is a refrigerator or a microchip. Just ask G.E. or Wal-Mart or Sun Microsystems. You can’t make an army greener without making it more secure. Just ask the U.S. Army officers who are desperate for distributed solar power, so they won’t have to depend on diesel fuel to power their bases in Iraq — fuel that has to be trucked all across that country, only to get blown up by insurgents. In pushing our companies to go green we are spurring them to take the lead in the next great global industry — clean power.
In sum, Al Gore has been justly honored for highlighting — like no one else — the climate challenge. But we still need a vision, a strategy, an army and a commander in the White House who can inspire young and old — not only to meet that challenge but to see in it the opportunity to make America a better, stronger and more productive nation. This is our crucible moment.
Donald Fleischman, the chairman of the Republican Party in Brown County, Wisconsin, faces criminal charges for allegedly fondling a 16-year-old Ethan House runaway and providing the boy with beer and marijuana late last year.
An emotional Ellen DeGeneres broke down on her show today, pleading with a dog rescue agency to return an adopted dog she had given to her hairdresser and two girls because it didn't get along with the cats at the DeGeneres-De Rossi household. Here is Ellen's tearful hello to her audience.Amen to that.
The AP reports: "The talk show hostess and her partner Portia de Rossi adopted Iggy, a Brussels Griffon mix, on Sept. 20. But when things didn't work out, DeGeneres gave the dog to her hairdresser. In doing so, DeGeneres violated an agreement with the Mutts and Moms agency by not informing them of the handoff. When the agency called DeGeneres to ask about Iggy, she said she found another home for the dog. The agency sent a representative to the hairdresser's home Sunday and took the dog away. DeGeneres went public with the doggy ordeal Monday while taping an episode of her show to air Tuesday. She admitted she didn't read all the paperwork involving the adoption."
Perhaps Mutts and Moms, a volunteer nonprofit organization in Pasadena, should add "militant" to their organization's name.
Email address: pawboutique@yahoo.comAnd for those who missed it, here is Ellen's heart-felt plea:
Website: http://www.muttsandmoms.org/
Phone: 626-394-0946
Where R U?Ahem. Here I am. Had a busy Monday at work and the weekend was a bit out of sorts. But I'm back.
There is something [very wrong] about having to hide this part of your identity at a time when your entire identity is threatened. That’s a faster pathway to depression, failure to thrive and even premature death.
The Conventional wisdom is that any president after Bush will gain a huge boost from world opinion. The only candidate for whom that would not apply, I think, is Giuliani...He cannot even reach non-white New Yorkers, let along the global Muslim opinion we need to win over.-Andrew Sullivan, on the differences between Mayor Giuliani (you have to give the guy credit for turning NYC around) and the possibility of a "President Giuliani" (if there's a terrorist attack, the already weakened Constitution wouldn't survive under a Giuliani presidency).
In every major war we have fought in the 19th and 20th centuries Americans have been asked to pay higher taxes — and nonessential programs have been cut — to support the military effort. Yet during this Iraq war, taxes have been lowered and domestic spending has climbed. In contrast to World War I, World War II, the Korean War and Vietnam, for most Americans this conflict has entailed no economic sacrifice. The only people really sacrificing for this war are the troops and their families.-Robert Hormats, vice chairman of Goldman Sachs International, and author of “The Price of Liberty” (a book about how America has paid for its wars since 1776) as quoted by New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, in his excellent Sunday column about how our kids are going to be paying a tremendous price for George Bush's war of choice.
The Massachusetts National Guard initially reported that Durkin was killed in action, though a Guard spokesman later said the term meant only that Durkin was serving in Afghanistan at the time.
Durkin's sister, Fiona Canavan, one of nine siblings in the family, has concerns that the shooting could have been related to Durkin's sexuality: "Ciara was a lesbian, and that's bound to come out. It is possible that someone over there found that out, and, you know, maybe they were very homophobic."
Canavan added: "She did say to us that she had concerns about things she was seeing when she was over there. She told us if anything happened to her, that we were to investigate it."
[Former Sen] Fred D. Thompson brought his remarks to a close with a nod of his head and an expression of thanks...Then he stood face to face with a silent audience.And he's supposed to be the savior of the conservative fascist wing of the Republican Party?
“Can I have a round of applause?” Mr. Thompson said, drawing a rustle of clapping and some laughter.
“Well, I had to drag that out of you,” he said.
What I don’t get is empty-barrel politics — Michigan lawmakers year after year shielding Detroit from pressure to innovate on higher mileage standards, even though Detroit’s failure to sell more energy-efficient vehicles has clearly contributed to its brush with bankruptcy, its loss of market share to Toyota and Honda — whose fleets beat all U.S. automakers in fuel economy in 2007 — and its loss of jobs. G.M. today has 73,000 working U.A.W. members, compared with 225,000 a decade ago. Last year, Toyota overtook G.M. as the world’s biggest automaker.span style="font-style:italic;">-New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, getting a bit exasperated over the brain dead domestic auto dealers.
Thank you, Michigan delegation! The people of Japan thank you as well.
While other Democrats talk Iraq, health care, and change, Biden talks Iraq, Iraq, and Iraq. At a press conference this month on the steps of Iowa's Capitol in Des Moines [he said], "I know how to make America safer!"-From Jonathan Rauch's Friday column in the National Journal on why Democrats should be looking a bit harder at the candidacy of Sen. Joe Biden (Democrat-DE).
He continued, "Immediately begin to draw down American combat troops.... Immediately give the troops all the protection they need while we're drawing them down...You must change the policy to put in place a federal, decentralized Iraq, giving the warring factions breathing room to establish their own security [and] control over the fabric of their daily lives."
For a year and a half, Biden (along with Leslie H. Gelb, a former president of the Council on Foreign Relations) has advocated devolving power to autonomous regions in Iraq. The presidential campaign has brought the plan into sharper focus - and, as Biden argues, into sharper contrast with what he plausibly regards as the wishful thinking prevalent in both parties.